Large Area Assistive Listening Systems: Review and Recommendations

REFERENCES

Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, Office of Technical Services, January 6, l981 Ruling.

Bankoski, S. M. & Ross, M. (l984). FM systems' effect on speech discrimination in an auditorium. Hearing Instruments, 35(7), 8‒12, 49.

Compton, C. L. (l991). Doorways to Independence. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.

Culpepper, N. B. (l986). Performance variability of the hearing aid telecoil. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 19, 126‒135.

Davidson, S. A. & Noe, C. M. (l994). Digitally programmable telecoil responses: Potential advantages for assistive listening device fittings. American Journal of Audiology, 3(2), 59‒64.

Federal Register, May 4, l977, Volume 42, No. 86.

Hermansen, H. (l979). A hearing aid may be only half the solution. Hearing Instruments, 30, 13‒15.

Johnstone, C. (l997). Assistive Listening Devices (ALSs). NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf.

Johnstone, C. (l999) Personal communication.

Laszlo, C. (l998) Personal Communication.

Lederman, N. & Hendricks, P. (l994). Induction Loop Assistive Listening Systems. In Communication Access for Persons with Hearing Loss, Ross, M. (Ed.), 19‒40. Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc.

Lieske, M. (l994). Infrared Systems. In Communication Access for Persons with Hearing Loss, Ross, M. (Ed.), 41‒50. Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc.

Nabelek, A. K. & Donahue, A. M. (l986). Comparison of amplification systems in an auditorium. Journal of the Acoustical Society of American, 79(6), 2078‒2082.

Nabelek, A. K., Donahue, A. M., & Letowski, T. R. (l986). Comparison of amplification systems in a classroom. Journal of Rehabilitative Research and Development, 23(1), 41- 52.

Nabelek, A. K. & Nabelek, I. V. (l994). Room acoustics and speech perception. In Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th Edition, Katz, J. (Ed.), 624‒637. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

Noe, C. M., Davidson, S. A. & Mishler, P. J. (l997). The use of large group assistive listening devices with and without hearing aids in an adult classroom setting. American Journal of Audiology, 6(3), 48‒63.

Preves, D. A. (l996). Revised ANSI standard for measurement of hearing instrument performance. The Hearing Journal, 49(10), 49‒57.

Preves, D. A. (l994). A look at the telecoil - its development and potential. SHHH Journal, , 15(5), 7- l0.

Rodriguez, G. P., Holmes, A. E. & Gerhardt, K. J. (l985). Microphone vs. telecoil performance characteristics. Hearing Instruments, 36(9), 22‒24, 57.

Ross, M. (l991). Microphone technique. Hearing Rehabilitation Quarterly, 16(4), 8‒11.

Ross, M. (l982). Communication Access. In The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report: State of the art-research needs. Studebaker, G. A. & Bess, F. H. (Eds.). Upper Darby, PA: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology.

Ross, M. (l992). Room acoustics and speech perception. In FM Auditory Training Systems: Characteristics, Selection, and Use, Ross, M. (Ed.), 21‒44. . Timonium, MD: York Press.

Ross, M. (1994) FM Large-Area listening Systems. In Communication Access for Persons with Hearing Loss, Ross, M. (Ed), 51‒70. Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc.

Thibodeau, L. & Abrahamson, J. (l988). Effects of coupling hearing aids to FM systems via neck loops. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 21, 49‒56. Williams Sound Corp (l981) Personal Communication.

Yuzon, E. (l992). FM personal listening systems. In Communication Access for Persons with Hearing Loss, Ross, M. (Ed.) 73‒102. Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc.