The Impact of Transfer Setup on the Performance of Independent Transfers: Phase I Final Report
References
1. Accessibility Guidelines for Recreation Facilities, (2002).
2. Accessible amusement rides - a summary of accessibility guidelines for recreation facilities. US Access Board; 2003.
3. Nyland J, Quigley P, Huang C, Lloyed J, Harrow J, Nelson A. Preserving transfer independence among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(11):649-57.
4. Gagnon D, Nadeau S, Noreau L, Eng J, Gravel D. Trunk and upper extremity kinematics during pivot transfers performed by individuals with sipanl cord injury. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(3):279-90.
5. Gagnon D, Nadeau S, Noreau L, Eng J, Gravel D. Electromyographic patterns of upper extremity muscles during sitting pivot transfers performed by individuals with spinal cord injury. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2009;19(3):509-20.
6. Gagnon D, Nadeau S, Gravel D, Noreau L, Lariviere C, McFadyen B. Movement patterns and muscular demands during posterior transfers toward an elevated surface in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(2):74-84.
7. Americans with Disabilities Act and Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines. In: Board USA, editor. Washington DC2004.
8. Finley M, McQuade K, Rodgers M. Scapular kinematics during transfers in manual wheelchair users with and without shoulder impingement. clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(1):32-40.
9. Gagnon D, Koontz A, Mulroy S, Nawoczenski D, Butler-Forslund E, Granstrom A, et al. Biomechanics of sitting pivot transfers among individuals with SCI: A review of the current knowledge. Topics in SCI Rehabilitation. 2009;15:33-58.
10. Sisto S, Druin E, Sliwinski M. Spinal cord injuries: management and rehabilitation. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
11. Accessible pools and spas - a summary of accessibility guidelines for recreational facilities. US Access Board; 2003.
12. Koontz AM, Toro ML, Kankipati P, Naber M, Cooper RA. An expert review of the scientific literature on independent wheelchair transfer. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2011.
13. Steinfeld E, Maisel J, Feathers D, D'Souza C. Anthropometry and standards for wheeled mobility: An International Comparison. Assistive Technology. 2010;22:51-61.
14. Guidelines for aircraft boarding chairs. Washington DC: US Access Board 1988 [cited 2011 June 22]; Available from: http://www.access-board.gov/research/aircraft-boardingchairs/aircrarft-boarding.pdf.
15. Accessible play areas - a summary of accessibility guidelines for play areas. US Access Board; 2005.
16. Dutta T, King EC, Holliday PJ, Gorski SM, Fernie GR. Design of built environments to accomodate mobility scooter users: part I. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2011;6(1):67-76.
17. King EC, Dutta T, Gorski SM, Holliday PJ, Fernie GR. Design of built environments to accomodate mobility scooter users: part II. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2011;6(5):432-9.
18. Koontz AM, Brindle E, Kankipati P, Feathers D, Cooper RA. Design features that affect the menueverability of wheelchairs and scooters. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010;91:759-64.
19. Tolerico ML, Ding D, Cooper RA, Spaeth DM, Fitzgerald SG, Cooper R, et al. Assessing mobility characteristics and activity levels of manual wheechair users. journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2007;44(4):561-72.
20. Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, Shipp K, Hoenig H. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social Science & Medicine. 2002;55:1435-46.
21. Souza A, Teodorski E, Sporner M, Cooper RA, editors. Effects of cross slopes on the mobility of manual wheelchair users. International Seating Symposium; 2010; Vancouver, CA.
22. LaPlante MP, Kaye HS. Demographics and trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assistive Technology. 2010;22(1):3-17.
User Comments/Questions
Add Comment/Question